The Mechanoid Cries Within

The Mechanoid Cries Within is a 2019 science fiction novelette by Brock T.I. Penner. The cover art was done by Pete Linforth. It was independently published by the author on September 4, 2019. The Mechanoid Cries Within is available for free by signing up for the author’s newsletter. The plot synopsis is as follows:

"RJ-A4A, a sentient and once free mechanoid finds himself kidnapped and sold into slavery to a wrathful owner, Davis. Surrounded by a wasteland of razorsand and rednecks who would torture him with glad, he spends his days toiling on Davis’s farm. RJ develops a bond with Davis’s lonely son, Lucien and his human-appearing mechanoid caretaker, AN. Out of desperation, he concocts a plan to escape the farm, the planet and slavery itself. All it would take is to manipulate AN and the boy into doing what he wants."

I found the premise of the story very interesting when it was first brought to my attention. Robots, androids and cyborgs in science fiction are nothing new, but very rarely do we see sci-fi stories being told from the robot’s perspective. Usually, the perspective comes from either humans, or an alien race substituting for humans, and robots are either side characters, happy to serve humanity, or villains trying to end humanity. Very few stories show the robot’s perspective or depict a nuanced view of humanity from said robot. RJ doesn’t hate humanity, he doesn’t want to wipe humanity out or enslave them, he just wants to be free. He wants his freedom and for his intelligence to be acknowledged as more than just lines of computer code.

The Mechanoid Cries Within is a story with a lot of potential. The premise is interesting, the three core characters, RJ, AN and Lucien, are compelling. I also enjoyed the smaller-scale story being told. The setting is contained solely to Davis’s farm, the stakes are, by all accounts, very low but the conflict makes it feel bigger. While there’s a lot of potential, the execution is fairly average. I found it difficult to follow in some places, needing to go back and reread to understand what was going on. I think this issue comes from there not being a clear separation between past and present. The story is mostly framed as RJ being forced to retell the story of something that happened, which makes the transition back and forth a little jarring. I feel like there are elements that would work better if the story was a little bit longer and more fleshed out. The word count is roughly 9,500 words, which is a very low word count for a completed story.

The Mechanoid Cries Within is a story I’d recommend it to a science fiction fan, looking for something quick to read.

Rating: 3.4 stars

The Woman In Cabin 10

Source: Amazon

The Woman In Cabin 10 is a 2016 thriller written by Ruth Ware. It was published by Scout Press, a division Simon & Schuster. The novel was a New York Times Bestseller and was named one of the best mystery books of 2016 by The Washington Post.

The premise of the novel is as follows. Lo Blacklock, a journalist for a travel magazine, is given a long-awaited, potentially life-changing assignment. A week on a small luxury cruise vessel through Norway. At first, the trip seems like a dream come true, but as the week continues, Lo witnesses something terrifying: a woman being thrown overboard. The only problem is that all the passengers remain accounted for, and the ship continues on its journey as if nothing happened. Lo then tries desperately to convince someone, anyone, that something is amiss.

The story starts off slow at first. The book opens with Lo being the victim of a burglary, and around thirty pages are dedicated to her having that experience, getting her locks changed, replacing a few of the stolen items and feeling traumatized about a man breaking into her house. Since the robbery winds up being significant later, I understand having that be the opening of the story. However, I personally felt like the sections about her buying a new phone and getting her locks fixed weren’t needed. Those details had no real significance to the plot and felt like unneeded filler.

Eventually, though, Lo goes off on her cruise where the main plot begins. A successful businessman married to a wealthy philanthropist has decided to start his own, exclusive luxury cruiseline to see the Northern Lights. She, along with other journalists and a few investors, are invited on the maiden voyage in a bid to earn good publicity and raise interest in the experience. She has a brief, random encounter with the woman in the cabin next to hers, number 10. She doesn’t see the woman at dinner later, and when she hears a body being thrown overboard, assumes the worst. Soon after, she’s informed that the cabin next to her was empty and no one, guest or staff, is unaccounted for. The bulk of the novel consists of Lo trying to figure out what happened and prove that the cabin was occupied and the woman did go missing to anyone who’d listen.

The mystery did intrigue me at the beginning. Was the woman a stowaway? Did Lo see what she thought she saw? Was this part of some conspiracy? How could a body have been thrown overboard and no one be missing? Those questions all occurred to me as I read. I became even more curious as, bit by bit, all the evidence she has either goes missing or is destroyed. It begins to look like this whole thing is a big cover-up.

My curiosity was diminished once lo really starts investigating. Her “investigation” consists of talking to the staff, asking them the same basic questions and receiving the same answers. For some reason, she doesn’t think to talk to more than one or two other guests, and when she does talk to them, she tries to be sneaky about it and ends up not asking anything relevant or likely to get results. The whole investigation part is pretty boring and repetitive. I still wanted to know what happened, but the story dragged on during this part.

All of my suspense went away once she finds herself captive and at the mercy of someone responsible for the mystery. I stopped being anxious, and started getting confused. There was a death, but it wasn’t who she thought. There isn’t one person acting alone on the ship. The death being covered up really doesn’t need to be. The “bad guy’s” plan doesn’t really make sense once its all explained. Once she works out what happened, the rest of the novel consists of Lo trying to figure out a way to get away from her captor and somehow reveal what really happened. Of course, those attempts are somewhat thwarted by finding herself in an unfamiliar place and not knowing who can and can’t be trusted.

I can’t really go any further in this review without discussing Lo herself. Lo, or Laura, isn’t a likeable character. Even before she stumbles upon this mystery, she’s rude to people she’s never met before, even ruder to her own boyfriend and a little conceited. On top of that, she’s somewhat of an unreliable narrator. She suffers from anxiety, due to the burglary, and takes medication for another condition, Unfortunately, her mental state makes her unreliable, and its even remarked on in the story that her medication, combined with alcohol, could have side-effects, leading a character to dismiss her. Her behavior is wildly erratic as well, since she goes from being livid at her ex-boyfriend, who’s on the trip because the story needed more drama I guess, to apologizing to him for reacting sensibly to something he does to her.

To be honest, I found this book to be fairly average. It has exciting moments, interspersed with stretches where it drags on. As stated earlier, I found the emphasis on the burglary to be a bit excessive and unneeded. It also irked me that the argument made, by a crew member, that everything was fine and Lo hadn’t seen a murder, was that she was projecting about the burglary. Later, he brought up that she was on medication and she maybe saw or heard something that wasn’t there as a result of that. The trope of “Character has mental illness, is therefore crazy and not to be believed by other characters” is insulting and I hate having to read it.

Overall, it’s an okay book. The mystery had potential for an interesting reveal or twist, but instead it followed the same plot as other stories with a few details changed. I wanted to like it, but there were too many moments when I got annoyed at the story itself, rolled my eyes and pushed through to finish the book. There was a lot of potential here, and Ware has been clearly inspired by Agatha Christie’s novels, but the potential hasn’t been realized. It’s a good book if you need something to read on a flight or a train.

Rating: 2.3 stars

Where the Crawdads Sing

This post contains affiliate links. This means when you follow a link and make a purchase, I make a small commission at no additional cost to you, the customer.

Where the Crawdads Sing is a 2018 novel by Delia Owens. It was published by G.P. Putnam’s Sons. It’s topped The New York Times Fiction Best Seller list for 20 non-consecutive weeks in 2019. The book was selected for Reese Witherspoon’s Hello Sunshine Book Club within two months of being published and Barnes & Noble named it one of the best books of 2018. It can be purchased here from Bookshop.org or here from Amazon.

The novel follows the life of Kya Clark, the so-called “Marsh Girl” who’s become a local legend in the town of Barkley Cove, North Carolina. Intelligent and sensitive, she’s lived most of her life alone in the marsh, mostly isolated from people and connecting with nature instead. In 1969, former football star Chase Andrews is discovered dead and the locals immediately being to suspect Kya.

The novel unfolds in two timelines. One depicts Kya’s life following her mother abandoning the family and describes her childhood and young adulthood growing up alone in the marshes. The second timeline explores the investigation of Chase’s death and the trial that follows. While the second timeline has some great moments, its in telling the story of Kya’s upbringing where Owens’ talent shines. She doesn’t simply tell the reader about the marshes, but transports them there. The rich imagery creates a vivid picture of a setting most readers would never witness personally, but somehow it feels familiar. I often find it difficult to full immerse myself in the setting of a book easily, but Where the Crawdads Sing is a rare exception. I found myself wanting to read more about the beautiful, yet sometimes eerie, land.

While the descriptions of the marsh, and the wildlife within it, are spectacular, they pale in comparison to how Kya is written. When I first picked up the book, I thought the premise would be too sad for me. Kya is a child when she is left pretty much on her own, save an alcoholic and often absent father. Others might use such a situation to tell a depressing story about what the loss of human connection can do to one’s mind. Owens is not others, though. While Kya is very obviously alone, I rarely felt a hopeless sense of loneliness. She is isolated from the town, but thanks to a handful of people, she’s not completely alone. Even when she was at her lowest, there was never a feeling of desperation or despair.

While many in town look down on the “marsh people” and sneer at the “Marsh Girl”, Kya is one of the most intelligent characters portrayed. She may have only gone to school for one day, but she knows and understands the animals and plants in the marsh better than anyone else. Kya is reclusive, yes, but its not entirely by choice. She was abandoned by her parents, her siblings, the school system, and a town that made no attempt to aid her, but the marsh, nature itself, did not. Her isolation might’ve been forced at first, but it becomes clear later on that she remains in the marsh by choice.

The book is touted as being somewhat of a murder mystery, but that isn’t the focus on much of the plot. The story centers around Kya and her coming of age in this strange situation. It’s Kya’s story, the murder investigation just happens to tie into that story. The bigger story is about survival and the resilience necessary to survive despite hard circumstances and seemingly no chance of the situation improving. As I mentioned earlier, this story has sad moments, but thanks to Owens’ writing and a well-crafted plot, it isn’t a sad story.

Now, its time to discuss a few tiny complaints I have. They are minor, but in order for this to be a balanced review, I can’t only talk about the positive aspects of Where the Crawdads Sing. The story does drag a little bit in certain parts, especially when Kya’s journey first begins. The prose is still praise-worthy, but some of the passages describing the world of the marsh are a little longer than they need to be. The same goes for different scenes of Kya trying, and failing, to make food the way her mother used to. The biggest letdown for me is how the murder investigation, and subsequent trial, is resolved. It wasn’t badly written, it wasn’t that it didn’t make sense, it was just kinda boring. The courtroom drama seemed as odds with the world the rest of the book created and felt tacked on. The ending was somewhat middling as well. It was a natural, but sadly boring, way to end Kya’s story. Rather than give the reader an ambiguous ending, Owens went for a finite ending, which doesn’t feel quite right for a character as independent and free-spirited as Kya.

 Where the Crawdads Sing is one of the best novels I’ve read this year. It’s a story about survival, love, desperation and hope. It’s a fantastic coming-of-age story that also delves into deeper themes about prejudice, humanity and our connection to nature. I enthusiastically recommend it to anyone slightly intrigued by its premise.

Rating: 4.7 stars  

Dark Places

Source: Barnes & Noble

Dark Places is a 2009 thriller by Gillian Flynn, whose other works are Sharp Objects and Gone Girl. It was published by Shaye Areheart Books. It was listed on the New York Times Best Seller List for fiction within a month of its publication date. The New Yorker named it one of the best books of 2009. Roughly six years later, a move adaptation starring Charlize Theron was released.

The summary of the book is as follows: Libby Day was seven when her mother and two sisters were murdered in the “The Satan Sacrifice” of Kinnnakee, Kansas. She survived, and later testified that her brother Ben was responsible. Twenty-five years after the murders, a group of true-crime fans contacts Libby and invites her to meet with them so they can question her for details. Many don’t believe Ben was the murderer and are searching for evidence that will clear his name. Libby, meanwhile, has fallen on hard times and hopes to make some quick cash off of the family tragedy. She makes a deal with the club, she’ll start looking for answers and report what she finds to them, for a fee. As her search takes her around the Midwest, some painful truths resurface and she finds herself once again on the run from a killer.

The narrative unfolds in two timelines. One timeline shows Libby’s journey in the present, digging into the truth of what happened that night and reconnecting with some of the others who may have hidden the truth years earlier. The other timeline is the story of what happened in the past, depicting the 24-hour period leading up to the murders. The perspective of the “past” chapters shifts between Libby’s mother Patty and her brother Ben. Patty’s chapters show the desperate situation the family was in financially before the murders and her desire to simply help her family. Ben’s POV chapters add dimension to his character and explain a few of the decisions he makes that are pivotal to the mystery at the center of the story.

While having a story, more specifically a mystery, being told in two timelines can be beneficial, I don’t think that style works as well as it could have in Dark Places. Given that the reader already knows what happens in January of 1985, there’s plenty of detail that could be omitted without effecting the plot. We already know Patty and two of her children are killed. We know Ben is arrested for the killing. Having two timelines is a solid tactic for introducing red herrings or revealing previously unknown facts, without having an exposition dump, but it isn’t used very effectively here. There is an entire subplot that unfolded in 1985, which revolves around 15-year-old Ben being accused of a crime, that serves as a rather heavy-handed red herring and I would say it has no real impact on the story as a whole if it didn’t further Patty’s narrative about trying to keep the family farm together. There was potential in Dark Places, but that potential wasn’t fully realized.

The novel is well-written, Flynn’s prose is fantastic as it is in all of her works. She does an excellent job of making the reader sympathize with, or in the very least like, characters that shouldn’t be likeable. Ben allegedly killed his family. Libby is using, and has used, the deaths of her mother and sisters to make money. There is a club called The Kill Club that’s fascinated by true crime to the point that not only do they decide to investigate murders for themselves, but they contact survivors and relatives of the victims, which is bound to reopen old, and painful, wounds. None of these characters should make you want this novel to have a fulfilling conclusion, an intriguing answer to the mystery, but thanks to Flynn’s writing chops, you do.

Let’s discuss the conclusion for a moment. As the novel’s premise suggests, and some earlier parts of this review imply, Ben was not the person who killed his mother and sisters. I know that is a spoiler, but it’s a spoiler that shouldn’t come as a shock to anyone. Television, films and literature have all taught us by now that if someone’s looking into a case after its been solved, the police caught the wrong person. The reveal of Patty’s real killer’s identity is underwhelming in my opinion. It isn’t an out-of-nowhere reveal, but there also aren’t quite enough clues sprinkled through out that tease or foreshadow the ending. In fact, the few clues that exist led me to a much different, and darker conclusion. Something that really bothered me about the truth of what happened didn’t relate to Patty’s death, but the deaths of the two daughters. The motive behind Patty’s death is clear in hindsight, and teased beforehand. The same isn’t true regarding the two daughters, Michelle and Debby. They die for different, and much worse reasons. My biggest criticism about the revelation, however, lies in how it happens as an act of chance. A character says something, reveals information they shouldn’t know, and that’s how the murder is solved. After reading 316 pages of what happened right leading up to the murders, and Libby trying to solve the murders, the whodunit is revealed when a character lets the wrong thing slip out. It’s not a bad way to have the revelation happen, it just doesn’t fit with this story.

Despite how critical I may seem, I enjoyed Dark Places. It was a well-written, intriguing story. Not my favorite of Flynn’s but that’s in no way a point against it. Dark Places, in my mind, is at a disadvantage, because I will compare every novel of Flynn’s against Gone Girl, and this novel, unfortunately, doesn’t stack up quite as well. It’s a good book, but one I found to be a little boring. It’s a quick read, and perfect for a day sitting on the beach or to enjoy on a plane or train. I would definitely read it again.

Rating: 3.5 stars

The Wife Between Us

Source: Barnes & Noble

The Wife Between Us is a 2018 thriller written by Greer Hendricks and Sarah Pekkanen. It was published by Pan Macmillian. The New York Time Book Review called it “a fiendishly smart cat-and-mouse thriller”, Glamour’s review stated “Buckle up, because you won’t be able to put this one down” and Publishers Weekly referred to it as “jaw dropping. Unforgettable. Shocking”.

A one-sentence description of the plot is that wealthy man’s jealous ex-wife becomes obsessed with her replacement, a younger, more beautiful woman he’s about to marry. Many other reviews cite a very compelling description from the book itself:

“When you read this book, you will make many assumptions.

You will assume you are reading about a jealous ex-wife.

You will assume she is obsessed with her replacement – a beautiful, younger woman who is about to marry the man they both love. 

You will assume you know the anatomy of this tangled love triangle.

Assume nothing.”

While I won’t begrudge anyone’s opinion, I can’t say I fully agree with the reviews I’ve mentioned above. The narrative is captivating at first. Unfolding through alternating POVs between Vanessa, Richard’s ex-wife, and Nellie, his young fiancé, the first half of the novel reads very well. The suspense builds as Vanessa gets more desperate and makes her way closer to confronting Richard’s new fiancé. Nellie’s fear about a woman who can’t seem to leave her alone, or move on with her life is palpable. The tension continues to build and build to the point where you wonder exactly what will happen when Nellie and Vanessa cross paths.

Then, the twist happens. Halfway through the narrative, a first twist is revealed. It shifts the narrative so that the reader is forced to reevaluate everything occurs up to that point. Unfortunately, the first twist is where the story falls apart. All of the tension built up to by that point washes away and the novel becomes a fairly adequate, by-the-numbers, drama. I would barely call it a thriller since, after that first twist, there’s very little suspense going on. More twists follow, each meaning less and less in terms of the narrative.

The novel is over four hundred pages, but there’s a lot of nothing that happens. Some of the filler in the story, or sidebars to explain certain details, are probably meant to make later twists mean more, or ramp up tension fail to do so. The story doesn’t need to go from one massively important scene or revelation to another, but way too much of the second half of the book is taken up by Vanessa reflecting on “what went wrong” with her marriage, which isn’t hard to figure out.

The novel is very trope heavy. Vanessa is a divorcee living a sad existence after her marriage falls apart. As soon as the divorce happens, her whole life loses meaning and she winds up living with her aunt and working in retail. Nellie is a naïve girl who’s caught up in this whirlwind romance with a successful businessman who gives her everything she could ever want. Richard is suave, powerful and lures Nellie in, despite hiding a secret. My biggest complaint when it comes to tropes is in Vanessa’s behavior towards Richard’s new fiancé. Her actions depict her as a crazy ex-wife which makes it even harder for her to pull off the one thing she’s trying to do. I’m really tired of reading the crazy ex-wife trope or the use of mental illness (its implied by Richard that Vanessa’s mentally ill because her mother was) as a plot device to explain why a character shouldn’t be trusted.

I think my main issue with this novel is how much hype surrounded it. The book was recommended to me by a coworker who claimed I’d enjoy it if I enjoyed Gone Girl. More than one book this year has been pitched to me in the same manner. I heard the same sales pitch last year about a number of books. I feel like the phrase “the next Gone Girl” is thrown around too liberally. Gone Girl was a fantastic thriller. Far too many subpar thrillers published in the following years are equated to it, and I for one think the comparison does an injustice to Gillian Flynn’s work. By saying The Wife Between Us is on the same level, I began reading with very high expectations, and was ultimately disappointed by the story I wound up reading.

The Wife Between Us is a good book, it isn’t fantastic and the narrative treats the plot twists like they are smarter than they really are. If someone asked me “is this book good”, I’d say yes. If I was asked “would you recommend it”, I might say yes, depending on my mood.

Rating: 3 stars.

Behind Closed Doors

Source: Amazon

Behind Closed Doors is a 2016 novel by B.A. Paris. It was published by St. Martin’s Griffin and was both a New York Times and USA Today bestseller. According to the description, it is a “psychological thriller you can’t miss!”

The novel focuses on Grace and Jack Angel. He’s a well-respected attorney focusing on domestic violence victims, while she’s a homemaker. From the outside they seem to have it all. As a tagline on the cover asks however, is this the perfect marriage or the perfect lie? Obviously, with a question like that posed, the answer becomes obvious. Things with the Angels are far from perfect, Jack is not the benevolent attorney, dedicated to saving women from their abusers that he seems to be. The novel centers around Grace trying to figure out what to do about her husband and how to remove herself, and her vulnerable sister Millie, from his sphere of influence.

The narrative unfolds in two timelines: past and present. This shows how Grace meets Jack and they get together while also contrasting it with the life she’s now living. The first chapter, which depicts a dinner party the Angels are hosting, does a fantastic job of filling the reader with a sense of doom and dread. Within a few pages, Grace’s actions and behaviors reminded me of The Stepford Wives. She’s the perfect hostess, the perfect cook, dinner goes down without a single mistake or flub, but at the same time, there’s an underlying fear of what would happen if dinner wasn’t perfect, if she wasn’t the charming hostess. I don’t like using other works to describe a feeling I get, but Stepford Wife was the only way I could describe it. Any work that invokes that comparison instantly gives the impression that either something is about to go horribly wrong, or it already has.

While the beginning creates a sense of dread, once it becomes clear the secret that’s being kept, the rest of the suspense drops off until the climax of the story. The tension in the first few chapters isn’t carried forward as effectively as I would’ve liked. Grace’s desperation is well-crafted and as the story progresses, the feeling of helplessness convinces the reader, or at least this reader, that she might not be able to get away. I’m not sure if I would quite qualify it as a thriller, mostly because there isn’t enough suspense. The actions of Grace and Jack propel the story forward, as opposed to a building up of tension.

As I alluded to earlier, and as the novel makes clear, Jack is hiding a huge secret. I will admit that the secret Jack hides and his motives aren’t quite what I predicted they might be when I read the synopsis of the book, I didn’t completely miss the mark. I went into the book expecting Jack’s secret to be that he’s a domestic violence attorney who, ironically, beats his wife. I expected him to be an abuser who hides behind the façade of someone advocating for abuse victims. That isn’t what his secret is, but he chose his profession deliberately and it isn’t to help others. Another thing I did not expect was the importance Millie, Grace’s 17-year-old sister with Down Syndrome, played in the story. She ended up being a much more important character in the conflict than I anticipated. Millie is smart, she’s resourceful and, despite her dislike of George Clooney, which has a purpose in the story, she’s a good character. Behind Closed Doors is one of the few books have read that has characters with Down Syndrome or another developmental disability that are well-written and multifaceted.

Now, it’s time to discuss some parts and elements that I wasn’t a fan of. There are two chief complaints that I haven’t touched upon yet. One is relatively minor, another related to a huge aspect of the story and plot. My minor complaint is about clichés in this type of work. It’s a psychological drama about the relationship between two people. As an easy way to show that Jack is a psychopath, and how psychopathic he is, he gets Grace a puppy and later kills it. This is the fourth book I’ve read this year where the first sign that the abusive or psychotic husband is abusive or psychotic is that he kills the dog. It does prove Jack’s a monster, but there were plenty of other, more creative, less obvious ways, to show that. Now, to my main complaint, Jack is apparently a supergenius, or psychic. By the time Grace learns the truth about him, he’s already planned for any and every possible contingency to make sure she can’t leave. Even events that are seemingly out of his control, he’s accounted for. The narrative shows only Grace’s perspective, so some aspects might be amplified for dramatic effect because she’s so scared, but his ability to predict any and everything that could happen gets a little annoying. Another thing I found incredibly frustrating is the fact that no one questions his behavior about certain things. No one apparently finds it weird that Grace can’t even go to the bathroom in a restaurant unless he waits outside the door for her. Not every character dismisses it, but far too many chalk it up to them being “so in love”. That behavior, and everyone’s dismissal of it, is part of why Grace is so desperate but it isn’t realistic in the way some of his other behavior is.

The central story is compelling. The twists and turns the story takes are also worth complimenting. Jack is a one-dimensional evil man, but that’s all he needs to be. Grace and Millie are both well-rounded and while I didn’t have a great opinion of Grace at first, as the story unfolds, her behavior had me saying “you’re an idiot, just leave” less and understanding her actions more. Behind Closed Doors is a great book, it’s not a fantastic one. I would recommend it but I don’t see myself gushing about it or insisting that everyone I know read it immediately.

Rating: 3.3 stars

One of Us is Lying

This post contains affiliate links. This means when you follow a link and make a purchase, I make a small commission at no additional cost to you, the customer.

One of Us is Lying is a young adult novel by Karen M. McManus. It was published in 2017 by Random House. Everyone I know who has read it describes the premise as “The Breakfast Club” meets “Pretty Little Liars” which is a pretty on the nose depiction. The book can be purchased here from Bookshop.org.

The non-spoiler-y summary is as follows: On a Monday afternoon, five students, a brain, a beauty, a criminal, an athlete and an outcast, walk into detention. An hour later, only four walk out. Simon, the outcast and the creator of a gossip app about the school, dies during detention. It’s soon revealed that his death was no accident. The four students in detention with him are the prime suspects and everyone has a motive. More people wanted Simon gone than didn’t.

What unfolds is a complex murder-mystery taking place in a modern high school. One of the strongest points of the book, and the most appealing, is this backdrop of a suburban high school. Unlike traditional mystery novels, a la Sherlock Holmes, the investigation takes place in our time. Simon’s death gains national attention and the investigation unfolds surrounded by, and impacted by, the 24-hour news cycle and the current trend to sensationalize everything. It’s on national news, a 48 Hours-like television program does a piece on the murder while its being investigated. The plot isn’t just impacted by news sources; there’s the added perspective of social media and the role it plays in hew news spreads and how stories are covered. It becomes clear, with some minor characters, that the death doesn’t matter much to them, but the attention the story gains is what they care about.

The novel unfolds through alternating point-of-view segments of the four suspects: Bronwyn (the brain), Addy (the beauty), Nate (the criminal) and Cooper (the athlete). While I’m not always a fan of narratives with alternating POVs, it works extremely well here because it gives the reader a chance to see the murder, and its aftermath, from more than one perspective. Not only does this provide possible motives for every character, but it also allows the reader to understand why a particular character wouldn’t have killed Simon. No one character is presented as being squeaky clean or obviously guilty. While the characters are all archetypes common in media aimed at teenagers, they aren’t one-dimensional, which is refreshing for the reader and adds depth to the story.

One of my favorite aspects of this book is how the characters’ lives are changed by this common event. Others become immediately suspicious of them, but that’s not the only outcome of Simon’s death. The murder, the investigation, the press coverage, the four students trying to solve what happened leads to each individual coming to some kind of realization, whether its about self-acceptance or getting a toxic person out of their life. The murder investigation is obviously a huge plotpoint, and their lives may never be the same, but smaller problems arise, less important details come to life. Despite the fact that they’re all suspects, and that each character only knows their truth about what happened, they are brought closer together by this event and try to work together to determine what exactly happened.

Now, let’s discuss the plot without spoiling the ending. I enjoyed the death itself, mostly because it posed an interesting mystery. Simon doesn’t get shot or stabbed. There isn’t a power outage and when the lights turn back on, he’s dead on the floor. He dies, everyone in the room sees it, but no one’s able to figure out what happened. How he died, and how the killer is able to kill him, is just as compelling as trying to figure out who did it. The revelation of how Simon died, and who killed him, is equally compelling, and unlike some novels, the answer doesn’t come out of nowhere, nor does there need to be an extensive amount of exposition given, for it to make sense. It also isn’t glaringly obvious up front who’s involved with what happened.

While I find McManus’s novel great overall, I do have some minor complaints. A few of the secrets the main four characters want to keep hidden are a bit cliché or overdramatized. Some of that could be chalked up to teenagers having heightened emotions, and everything feeling like a huge deal in high school. Simon, our murder victim, has plenty of enemies and people who aren’t sad to see him die which feels a little bit of a cop-out, but that could just be me. There were a few scenes in the book where a character’s actions seemed a bit over the top or their words didn’t sound like something a normal person would say. Again, this is just my opinion but those scenes kind of took me out of the story a little bit. I found the treatment of one character after her secret gets out, because of course the secrets are revealed, was a little heavy-handed but I’m also picky about the specific topic it covered. My dislikes are mostly related to small details, and not major aspects to the story.

Rating: 4 stars

The Power

This post contains affiliate links. This means when you follow a link and make a purchase, I make a small commission at no additional cost to you, the customer.

What would happen if, one day, women developed the ability to emit electricity from their fingertips? How would politics and society change as a result of women gaining a power over men? What happens when the powerful find themselves suddenly powerless, and women become the physically dominant gender? These questions rest at the center of The Power by Naomi Alderman. Spoiler alert- the answer isn’t the utopia we’d all like to believe would occur. The novel can be purchased here from Bookshop.org.

The Power is written in a “book within a book” format. It’s framed as a historical novel written by Neil Adam Armon (an anagram of Naomi Alderman’s own name) which he’s sent to a friend to read and review. Having been written 5,000 years after an event called the Cataclysm, it chronicles what happens in the ten years before the Cataclysm that led to the event and society being rebuilt as a matriarchy after the dust settled.

One day, women and post-pubescent girls across the globe develop the ability to electrically shock others with a simple touch, to the extent of being able to electrocute a person if desired. What starts out as a rare ability soon develops into nearly all women having the power. With women now having a power, things soon transition into having most of the power, and the changes that comes with it. Men are no longer the gender to be most feared. Some men aren’t willing to relinquish power and some women feel like comeuppance is in order.

The Power’s concept I found fascinating when it was first suggested to me. Rather than a story about a world without men or a world where humanity was always a matriarchal society, it depicts how modern society would react to a change from patriarchy to matriarchy. It’s also a novel that becomes more difficult to read as things escalate. When the women’s power first becomes known, changes are minimal, and familiar to many female readers. Boys and men are advised not to travel alone or at night. They learn to become much more aware of their surroundings. Things most women today take as common sense. As things progress, tensions escalate and some go overboard now that they have power. As one very poignant line in the book states:

It doesn’t matter that she shouldn’t, that she never would. What matters is that she could, if she wanted.

Alderman depicts, in a stark lighting, why a woman-run world would not and could not be the utopia others might argue it would be, and does so realistically. Men wouldn’t willingly give up power, especially in less developed parts of the world. Women who have suffered all their lives at men’s hands, likewise, wouldn’t gain superiority over them and not attempt to get revenge. Men made women suffer, and now women will make men suffer. It shows that it isn’t sex that makes the powerful do terrible things, it’s the power itself. Alderman weaves a descriptive, even at times horrifying, narrative showing this transition, and the extremes both sides will go to for their agenda.

The aspect of this work I liked most was the way the story unfolds. It begins ten years before the Cataclysm, when the power is first discovered, and each section of the book brings the reader closer and closer to the day the Cataclysm takes place and reveals how this world-ending event came to be. The progression of these events is told from multiple perspectives throughout the book:

• Allie- A troubled teen who discovers her power and, following a confrontation with her abusive foster father, runs away to convent. She becomes a religious figure known as Mother Eve, whose significance becomes amplified in the world post-Cataclysm
• Roxy- One of the first women to discover her power. She attempts to use it to save her mother, unsuccessfully and strives to get revenge. She crosses paths with Mother Eve while trying to grow her power. She’s shown to be the physically strongest wielder of the power, wile Mother Eve is the most skilled at using it.
• Margot- An American politician who was often overlooked by her male colleagues. She advocates for girls to be trained on using their powers. Men fear the training camps she establishes are precursors to creating a militarized force of female soldiers. Her daughter, Jocelyn, develops the power early and struggles to control it.
• Tunde- The only male POV character in the novel-within-a-novel. He is the first person to capture a video of the women’s newfound power. This leads to him becoming a freelance journalist and traversing the globe to report on uprisings as women in male-dominated countries begin uprisings.

These characters’ stories all converge in Moldova just before the Cataclysm. Explaining why and how each character ends up there would spoil significant elements of the individual stories and the narrative as a whole. My favorite thing about these characters is that no one character is the “hero”. Every character exists in the grey area and while some began with good intentions, those get warped.

The Cataclysm isn’t shown, nor its immediate aftermath. The novel ends with Neil, the fictitious writer 5,000 years post-Cataclysm, and Naomi corresponding back and forth about his novel. This is the only glimpse we get of the world after the Cataclysm, and the questions that are brought up sound somewhat familiar.

How much stock should be put in history books about what happened centuries ago? How much information was lost because of personal biases? To what extent should biology define us? Lastly, is the power structure we occupy and the society we live in “natural”? Are we capable of better? Do we simply choose not to be better?

Rating: 4.5 stars

In A Dark, Dark Wood

“In a dark, dark wood, there was a dark, dark house. And in the dark, dark house, there was a dark, dark room.” This theme is common among most horror and thriller stories going back generations. We are told from an early age that the woods and dark places are scary and that we should avoid them. A remote house in the middle of dense woods is the setting for In A Dark, Dark Wood. In A Dark, Dark Wood is a 2015 thriller/mystery novel written by Ruth Ware. It quickly became a New York Times bestseller and was named one of the best books of the year by NPR.

Source: Simon & Schuster

The premise of the book is this: a reclusive writer names Leonora, Nora to her friends, is invited to a hen do, or as its known in the US a bachelorette party, by her friend Clare. Given that she hasn’t seen Clare in ten years, she’s shocked and a little confused that she’s been invited. She somewhat reluctantly agrees to attend. The event is being held at a remote house in the woods owned by a relative of one of the bridesmaids.  As the weekend progresses, it soon becomes clear that not everything is as it seems and the group may not be alone in the woods. Someone may not make it out of the woods alive.

The story is very much told in two parts. There are the events of the bachelorette party and the events that take place after. Someone dies and the “after” storyline depicts the police trying to determine what exactly happened, along with the narrator. The transition back and forth can be a little jarring, but it prevents the reader from learning too much information at any one time.

The writing is pretty good with Ware doing a noteworthy job building suspense as time goes on. The book isn’t badly written, the plot makes sense, and the reveal doesn’t come out of nowhere. If anything, the opposite is true. My criticism comes from two fronts. Predictability and a reliance on convenience.

First, predictability. I was able to accurately guess who the killer was early on. Most of the characters are archetypes that serve a single purpose. It’s clear, once the characters are gathered together, who the killer is and who the "fake-out" murderer is. The character that’s set-up to seem like the killer is painted early on as a nervous wreck, so it becomes clear that person isn’t the killer, due to how obvious it seems. The only thing that I didn’t predict was a detail about Nora’s backstory that is only terribly important as it relates to the killer’s motive. Nora’s backstory is focused on a little too much and, in the end, it exists to make the motive seem more legitimate. There’s nothing wrong with a story being predictable, I was just hoping for more.

The plot relies a lot on convenience. Lenora is in a car accident after the murder, which means she doesn’t remember what happened. The unreliable narrator angle is why the dual storylines work, but the decision to have an unreliable narrator, and the reason why she’s unreliable, is still incredibly convenient. The way the victim ends up at the house is based entirely on convenience. The murder was planned, but how it happened cycles back to one or two very specific events that could've gone differently, preventing the murder altogether. Patterns of behavior are ignored until they suddenly become relevant when the plot needs them to. I understand the need for convenience and red herrings, but there comes a point where the story is too reliant on coincidence.

I read this book on the beach and I liked it, but I wasn’t thrilled by it. It didn’t blow my mind like many others have. I suppose my biggest gripe with it is that there was potential for a compelling story, but it never manifested. The setting in the middle of the woods never gets taken full advantage of. I picked up the book expecting a supernatural thriller or even just a creepy thriller. I didn’t get that. Instead, it was a fairly by-the-numbers murder mystery without that much actual mystery.

Overall rating: 2.5 stars