Monday, July 6, 2020

God Emperor of Dune


44439415. sy475

God Emperor of Dune is a 1981 science fiction novel by Frank Herbert. It was published by Putnam. It’s the fourth book in the Dune saga following Dune, Dune Messiah and Children of Dune. My reviews on the previous books can be found here.

God Emperor of Dune takes place 3,500 years after the conclusion of Children of Dune. Leto II Atreides has reigned as emperor of the known universe for millennia. In an effort to preserve humanity’s future, Leto sacrificed his own by becoming inhuman. Under his rule, the desert planet of Arrakis has become a lush paradise, the all-important spice mélange has become scarce and humanity as a whole has been prevented from exploration. A rebellion led by Siona Atreides, a distant descendant of Leto’s, has arisen to oppose the god emperor, but unknown to Siona, Leto’s Golden Path for humanity requires her to fulfill a destiny she never could’ve conceived.

By far, this was the book I enjoyed the least in the series. It’s mentioned in the introduction, written by the author’s son, that Dune, Dune Messiah and Children of Dune formed their own quasi-trilogy and God Emperor of Dune was the start of a new trilogy and that’s evident by the overall tone of this novel. Dune was never the most optimistic story, and it has a recurring theme of “you can’t change what’s meant to happen” but this novel was far darker and far more cynical than its predecessors. While I applaud Herbert for making Leto a tyrant and not trying to shy away from the fact that he’s a tyrant, this series has reached a point where those elements got tiring for me.

My biggest issue with this novel is the pacing. The copy I read was nearly 600 pages, but there’s a large section of the book where nothing of importance seems to happen. The beginning has a lot of things happen, the end has a lot of activity, but the middle is nothing. Siona plans her rebellion. Leto talks a lot about the future and his Golden Path but says very little of substance. There’s a lot of talking and plotting that never seems to go anywhere. This book basically had a lot of filler, and from the writing, I think the filler was meant to make the reader consider the overall themes of the book, but the middle of the book is so dry and boing, that I just found myself getting irritated. This series has also veered away from its science fiction roots. It’s technically still sci-fi, due to cloning, space travel and advanced technology, but most of the plot fits better into the fantasy category than science fiction. I wish the narrative had stuck closer to science fiction.

This novel has a cast of characters, but there’s not a lot I can really say about them. Leto II is the main character, but as a result of his extended life and no longer being human, he doesn’t really have much of a personality or character growth. Most of the scenes he’s in involve him either plotting to achieve his Golden Path, finding it funny that no one else realizes what he’s doing or  waxing poetic about humans unwittingly continuing the same cycle of violence and oppression even as they work to break the cycle. There is Moneo, a descendant, servant and close confidant of Leto’s. He’s torn between being scared of Leto’s non-human side and doing everything in his power to keep the emperor happy and making the Golden Path come to fruition. Hwi Noree, the Ixian ambassador, is sent to serve in Leto’s court and he falls in love with her, as she was designed to ensnare him. While I didn’t have anything against her, Herbert didn’t really give the reader a reason to like her or care about her relationship with Leto. We’re not really shown how she’s irresistible to Leto, or the other characters who fall under her spell. The reader is told that she was designed to make Leto fall for her, but nothing is really shown to enforce that idea. Lastly, we have Siona, who was my favorite character because she had a real personality. She had agency and a goal, which no other character aside from Leto is shown to have, and she read like an actual person. While she wasn’t necessarily a “good” person, she was the best character in the novel because aside from Leto, she was the only one who had real conviction behind her actions, not just blind devotion.

I know this review has been negative so far, however I don’t want to make it seem like this is a terrible book. It’s just a very boring one that I struggled to get through. There are three things about this book that saved it from being a 0 Star book. The first is its message about the nature of humanity. All of Leto’s actions, every act of oppression he’s caused, he’s done because he knows something needs to change within humanity. He spent years keeping humanity as a whole safe, but not allowing people true freedom, in preparation for what will happen when he’s no longer around. He spent three thousand years controlling humanity so that when he’s gone, they’ll become something better than it once was. The second is its discussion about messiahs and godhood. In Dune Messiah, Paul Atreides struggles with being a messiah to the Fremen and dealing with the blood their holy war, in his name, has spilt. In this novel, that idea was taken a step further to explore the idea of godhood and the affect that has on the person being worshipped. And it’s not a nice image, but the acknowledgement of the problems with worshipping a person as a god makes the progression of events and resolution of the plot really work. The last element I enjoyed was the subversion of a particular trope. Early in the novel, it’s mentioned that Siona, as an Atreides, is going to be tested soon. Her “test” is mentioned dozens of times before it happens. The expectation, even in-universe, is that this test will cause Siona to abandon her rebellion and hatred of Leto. If anything, Siona being tested results in her becoming even more convinced of the need for a rebellion. As a result, the conclusion came as a pleasant surprise to me.

God Emperor of Dune was a disappointment for me. Herbert clearly had a lot of very big ideas, but didn’t quite manage to explore on those ideas in an interesting and entertaining way. I liked elements of the plot, but not the plot overall. I can see how this novel sets up the events of the last two novels in the Dune saga written by Frank Herbert, but given how much I disliked this novel, I don’t think I’ll be reading them. Right now, I’m no longer invested in the rest of this story, as its moved so far away from what was seen in the original Dune. Instead, I might read one of the prequel books, particularly the ones focused on the war against the Thinking Machines. A war against robots seems more entertaining to me than god emperors playing 5-dimensional chess with themselves.

Rating: 1.6 Stars

Follow Me Elsewhere: Facebook \ Twitter \ Goodreads \ Instagram

Buy Me A Coffee?

Wednesday, July 1, 2020

June Wrap-Up

This post contains affiliate linksThis means when you follow a link and make a purchase, I make a small commission at no additional cost to you, the customer. Affiliate links are marked with an asterisk (*) after the link for simplicity


Image result for book closing

It's the end of the month, which means it's wrap-up time.  Now, let's get into the books.

Books I Read and Reviewed

Warrior of the Wild* by Tricia Levenseller- 4.2 Stars

The Enixar: The Sorcerer's Conquest by Mikkell L. Khan- 2.7 Stars

Empress of All Seasons* by Emiko Jean- 3.4 Stars

The Knight's Daughter by S. H. Cooper- 3.1 Stars

Chaos of Stars* by Kiersten White- 3.6 Stars

Books I Read, Only Reviewed on Goodreads

The Tablet by Robert Thomas Minsky- 4 Stars (Goodreads review)

Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring* by J. R. R. Tolkien- 5 Stars

The Witches of Willow Cove by Josh Roberts- 4 Stars (Goodreads review)

Woman by V.P. Evans- 3 Stars (Goodreads review)

A River of Darkness* by Masaji Ishikawa- 4 Stars (Goodreads review)

From A Shadow Grave by Andi C. Buchanan- 2 Stars (Goodreads review)

Genres Read

Children's Books: 1

Fantasy: 7

Thriller: 1

Contemporary: 1

Non-Fiction: 1

Figures

Number of DNFs: 0

Total Books Read: 11

Pages Read: 2,641

Average Rating: 3.5

What did you read in June? Any recommendations?

Follow Me Elsewhere: Facebook \ Twitter \ Goodreads \ Instagram

Buy Me A Coffee?

Monday, June 29, 2020

The Chaos of Stars

This post contains affiliate linksThis means when you follow a link and make a purchase, I make a small commission at no additional cost to you, the customer.


The Chaos of Stars

The Chaos of Stars is a 2014 young adult fantasy novel by Kiersten White. The novel was published by HarperTeen in September of 2014. While I'd known of the author prior to reading, this was the first novel of hers I've written. The cover is what really drew me in, despite the old adage about not judging books by their covers. It can be purchased here from Bookshop.org or here from Amazon.

The novel tells the story of Isadora, the human daughter of the Egyptian deities Isis and Osiris. When she grows tired of her family's treatment of her, she's given a chance to travel to California to live with her brother. Her new life in the United States comes with its own challenges and dangers however, and Isadora struggled to keep her old life and her new life separate.

There's a very interesting cast of characters in this book, as you'd expect for a story focusing on the family lives of gods. Isadora, our narrator, was my favorite character. Raised by gods, she's become disillusioned by her family after learning that, although her parents will live forever, they're going to let her die. She wants a life outside of the Egyptian pantheon and to be defined as someone other than just Isis's daughter. She also has a lot of sass and personality, which I liked. Her parents are, as mentioned, Isis and Osiris. Osiris is the typical emotionally-unavailable father, given that he spends most of his time in the land of the dead. Isis alternates between seeming to care about her children to only being focused on how they're a reflection of her. Neither characters are inherently villains, but they're not meant to be likeable or sympathetic. Other Egyptian gods such as Horus, Anubis and Nephthys make appearances in this story as well. Once the setting changes to California, the reader is introduced to Sirius, Isadora's older brother, along with Tyler and Ry, friends she makes during her stay. Tyler and Ry are by far the two most relatable characters in the story, wanting Isadora to have fun and experience new things. Despite not knowing her for long, they care about her and each help her open up in their own way. I especially liked Ry and how his relationship with Isadora developed. In short, this book has a plethora of characters to enjoy.

I enjoyed the writing in this novel for two reasons. The first is that scenes in the present are interwoven with dreams Isadora is having and trying to figure out the meaning of. Each chapter begins with an anecdote, from Egyptian mythology, as told by Isadora and with a little more candor as a result. The stories really add to the characterization of the deities being discussed. The dreams give the reader a sense of the stakes of the story.Both elements feed into the foreshadowing within the story. The second reason why I enjoyed the writing was because White does an excellent job of setting a scene without going overboard. Whether the scene is describing Isadora's home in Egypt or the museum she volunteers at in California, it's very easy to picture the setting in your head while reading. Lastly, I was genuinely surprised by the main plot twist of the novel. Isadora has this feeling that something bad is going to happen for most of the novel, but the revelation of who is behind these events is executed perfectly.

The Chaos of Stars is a novel that is more character-focused than plot-driven. While there is a clear plot within the story, centered around Isadora trying to keep her life in Egypt separate from her life in California and keep everyone safe, most of the novel focuses on Isadora's growth and her coming to terms with her place within her family. This means that the pacing for the book is a little slow in parts. One event related to the main plot will occur and then a few chapters will pass before something related to that plot-point will come up again. This meant that while this was a quick read for me, I wasn't invested in much of what was going on for the middle of the book. As I mentioned above, I enjoyed the main plot twist/reveal of the story, however some of the earlier and smaller twists were very obvious to me early on. I'm not sure if all of the ones I'm thinking of were meant to be plot twists, but if they were, they didn't really surprise me very much. While I mentioned above that I liked Ry and Isadora's relationship, it was very clear to me early on that they were meant to fit into the friends-to-lovers trope. I don't have a problem with this trope, but it was so clear to me early on that that's what was being set up that I was hoping it wouldn't happen. I liked their friendship, but felt so-so about their romance.

The Chaos of Stars is a solid fantasy novel. The writing overall was pretty amazing. I found the premise interesting and I liked the elements of Egyptian mythology. The pacing and some of the foreshadowing could use improvement in my opinion. I'd recommend this novel to anyone looking for a quick read, especially if they're interested in a character-driven story.

Rating: 3.6 Stars

Follow Me Elsewhere: Facebook \ Twitter \ Goodreads \ Instagram
Buy Me A Coffee?

Wednesday, June 24, 2020

10 Bookish Pet Peeves

Top 30 Scoff GIFs | Find the best GIF on Gfycat

I've been thinking a lot about the tropes I do and don't like in books. Thinking about this quickly turned into me realizing that I have some literary pet peeves that I need to get off my chest. Here are my ten biggest book pet peeves that no one asked for. These aren't in any particular order.

Watered Down Tolkien

I'm not going to sit here and pretend like all high-fantasy isn't compared to Tolkien. The Lord of the Rings had huge influence on the development of the genre and authors who would go on to write high-fantasy. I won't, and can't, fault an author for taking inspiration from Tolkien. My issue is when it's clear an author is trying to be the next Tolkien. You can have all the elves, dwarves and orcs that you want, but if you don't do anything new with those races, if there isn't something unique about the story, it feels like you're just ripping off Tolkien.

Non-sensical (Or Unneeded) Plot Twists

Plot twists need to make sense. There need to be breadcrumbs spread throughout the story giving the reader a sense of foreshadowing. If a happy-go-lucky side character changes for the last three pages to suddenly be a jerk because the bad guy shapeshifted to look like him, that's a bad twist. If the same character gets separated from the rest of the group halfway through, and when he's reunited he's been acting "strange" or seems less happy, that same twist works a little better. Plot twists also need to be crucial for the story to move forward. A book can have multiple plot twists, but the story needs to justify it. Either the thriller's two POV characters are actually the same person from different points in time or the main character is suffering from dissociative identity disorder. You can't have both just for shock value. Don't have a twist just to have a twist.

Bad Allegory

I feel like people want to write an allegorical novel, or have an aspect of their story be an allegory to something else, but they aren't willing to commit to it. In a science fiction novel, the treatment of one alien population by another is meant to be an allegory for racism, but the author doesn't go deep enough into the idea by exploring or expanding upon the in-universe consequences of the idea. So, the "racism" allegory falls apart and the message becomes very surface level. That's just an example, but I think we can all name at least one book where the author meant for it to be deep and thought-provoking, but failed.

Mean Girls Who Don't Make Sense

This one might need an explanation. I don't have a problem with "mean girl" characters, if it makes sense to have them in a story. They fit YA coming-of-age stories or contemporary fiction, maybe even in romance. Mean girls in fantasy or science fiction though? That's where I have an issue. If the protagonist is already dealing with an evil wizard, why do they also have to encounter Regina George?

Everyone Ends Up Married

I'm not the only person who has problems with this one, but I thought it should feature here. I'm not saying that a book can't have romance. I just hate it when the last chapter or two of a book consists solely of giving every character a partner. Especially for books that are not primarily romances. Please don't waste my time pairing people up. I don't care that much about the romantic subplots.

Jerky Love Interests

I mentioned this in my post about my feelings about romantic subplots, but I thought I should mention it here. You can write a bad boy without needing to make him a misunderstood outcast with a heart of gold. If he's a jerk for most of the book, and then does one nice thing, that doesn't make him a viable love interest. Enemies to lovers is one thing, if done well. But if I'm actively wishing that the protagonist ends up with anyone else, the romantic tension is actually complete and utter disdain.

Excessive Unanswered Questions

I know that some books are meant to make you think. Some authors end books the way that they do to make the reader want more. But sometimes, there are a boatload of unanswered questions at the end of a book because there wasn't enough world-building or the author didn't show/tell the reader enough information in the text to understand. "What happens next?" is very different than "I know what I read, but I have no idea what it's supposed to mean". Even if I don't know everything about the world, I should know enough or be able to fill in the blanks enough so that the cliffhanger/set up for the sequel, is actually a cliffhanger and not result in me wondering why I should suddenly care about this new character/threat.

Inconsistent or Unrealistic Dialogue

People are inconsistent. It's a fact of life and realistic characters might have inconsistencies. However, when characters speak a certain way, whether it's an absence of slang terms or not using contractions, or sounding like they stepped out of a Shakespeare play, for most of a novel and then suddenly the dialogue pattern changes, it becomes glaringly obvious and it feels weird to the reader. Likewise, who a character is needs to be taken into account when writing dialogue. A teenager's dialogue should sound like a teenager, not a 40-year-old housewife. It's very obvious when characters in specific groups are being written by people who've haven't spoken to members of that group in a while.

Two Minute Battles

I may have mentioned this in some of my reviews, but how the antagonist is stopped is just as important as writing a compelling villain. Don't spend 290 out of 300 pages telling me how evil and powerful the bad guy is only to have him be defeated in two pages. Unless this is a fake-out, and the heroes were fighting an underling disguised as the bad guy, it's a letdown. If the conflict with the antagonist isn't the main focus of the story (say, the romance comes first), don't build the villain up to be a huge threat.

Everything-But-The-Kitchen-Sink-itis

I know that's a long name for it, but it fully encapsulates how it feels while reading something that falls into this category. There are a few books I can name where the author clearly had too many ideas and not enough pages to devote to them. Instead of cutting some ideas out, and saving them for a sequel or another story entirely, they decide to include everything. As a result, all of these ideas are thrown in and there's not enough time to do each idea justice. To use The Hunger Games as an example, there's a reason why the 74th Games and the war against the Capitol didn't happen in the same book. It allowed the author a chance to give each one the attention it deserved. By having too many "big events" happen in one book, each one suffers.

Those are my ten biggest bookish pet peeves. Or at least the ten biggest I can think of at the moment What are some of your literary pet peeves? Are there any I mentioned that you like?

Follow Me Elsewhere: Facebook \ Twitter \ Goodreads \ Instagram

Buy Me A Coffee?

Monday, June 22, 2020

The Knight's Daughter

52534389. sx318
The Knight's Daughter is a 2020 middle grade fantasy novel by S. H. Cooper. The novel is a sword and sorcery fantasy. It's the first book in the Lady Knight trilogy. I was provided with an advanced copy in exchange for a review.

The novel follows a 14-year-old girl named Mary McThomas who has spent her life dreaming of becoming a knight like her father. After an ambush on their village leaves Mary's father in critical condition, Mary's willing to do whatever it takes to save him. Together with her older brothers and a mysterious fae, Mary finds herself entering a world of danger and magic. While Mary searches for a cure, dark forces search for Mary, seeking her for their own gain.

The Knight's Daughter has four major characters: Mary, Drake and Joseph, her brothers, and Torren, the fae who approaches Mary, claiming she knows a way to save her father. Mary begins the novel as being very unsure of herself and she's not entirely sure about who she is and where she fits into the world. Drake and Joseph, both seventeen, are on the cusp of adulthood and the attack leaves them trying to fill the role their father usually holds in terms of protecting their family. I enjoyed reading the dynamic between the siblings and how their relationship grew and changed over the course of the novel. Given that this is a middle-grade novel, there isn't much character development to speak of, and the development that is there is mostly centered around the three McThomas siblings learning more about themselves and their place in the world. Torren is a fae who initially helps Mary because the man behind the attack on the village, Meverick Conan, had previously attacked her people. Conan serves as the story's main antagonist, who has people hunting for Mary for unknown reasons. He's filled with a desire for revenge and believes Mary is the key to achieving it. Along the journey, Mary and her traveling companions meet a plethora of people, both good and bad. My personal favorite was Reena, who belongs to a nomadic group. I thought she was the funniest minor character.

I found the story to be rather amusing. I enjoyed reading about the fae and the magic within the world. Cooper did an excellent job with the world-building, giving the reader plenty of information and exposition without making it feel like a lot. I also liked the theme of family that is present throughout the story. Mary's brothers join her on the journey, not to have a fun adventure, but to make sure nothing happens to her. The plot itself is centered on their family, which was refreshing because a lot of younger fantasy involves separating the main character from their family and having them go on a journey alone. I appreciated the explanation of why Mary was both the only person who could help her father and why Conan was hunting for her. I'm not a big fan of "chosen ones", which Mary is in a way as she finds out late into the story, but the in-universe reason given fits with this story.

Before I go into some criticism I have of The Knight's Daughter, I do want to briefly touch on how this book works as a middle grade novel. I don't do this for young adult works because YA and adult have a lot more overlap than middle grade and adult. From a technical perspective, this is an excellent middle grade book. The story and world aren't too advanced for younger readers. The writing itself is very easy to digest. Other than a few fight scenes, there isn't anything within the story that's too heavy or advanced for middle grade.

While I enjoyed The Knight's Daughter, there were a few aspects to the story that didn't quite work for me. As mentioned above, the writing is very straightforward, which as an adult reader is a negative, but as I said, it's great for the intended audience. As a result of the writing being so easy to digest, I don't really have an opinion on the author's writing style. I was a little confused by the pacing. There were parts where the narrative seemed to slow down more than it should've and then it took a while for things to pick back up. Conversely, there were parts towards the end that felt needlessly rushed. Lastly, there was a particular reveal/plot twist that seemed kind of tacked on. I don't want to give any spoilers, but to me, it felt like the twist had been added to set up the second book, and that wasn't needed since there was enough of the main plot was unresolved for the second book already.

The Knight's Daughter is an entertaining, quick read. It has relatable characters, magic and an overall good story. While I had some issues with pacing and the writing itself, I don't want that to deter others from reading it. I think it's great for middle grade readers who are trying to figure out what genres they like. I'd also recommend it to reader who enjoy Arthurian or medieval fantasy specifically.

Rating: 3.1 Stars

Follow Me Elsewhere: Facebook \ Twitter \ Goodreads \ Instagram
Buy Me A Coffee?